Wednesday, March 05, 2008

Link to my WordPress blog

Thank you to all who have visited this blog.
From now on, I will not be posting new articles on this blog.
You will still find everything that has been posted here.
For new articles, please visit Christ in all the Scriptures / The Theology of G C Berkouwer.
This WordPress blog contains all the posts from my three Blogger blogs - "Christ in all the Scriptures", "The Theology of G C Berkouwer", "Let's Share the Good News."
Here's another link to my work on Scripture and Theology.

Some posts from my "Let's Share the Good News" blog

Acts 20:17-38 (a sermon)

What's so different about the 21st century?

In so many ways, the 21st century is completely different from the 1st century.

With our computers, we can listen to a sermon from the other side of the world. We can listen to it and we can watch it being preached - as it happens, live!

This is so different from life in the time of Christ and His Apostles.

Very different - Yes! - but is it completely different?

Can we, in the 21st century, afford to ignore the voices which speak to us from the 1st century?

We search for a model for Church life, a model for ministry, in the 21st century. We learn about modern methods of communication. Still, we are faced with the question - Have we listened to what the Lord Jesus has to say to us?

When I was a young student at Stirling University, I took the members of our Christian Union Committee to hear my Minister, the Rev George Philip. We were thinking of asking him to speak at our Christian Union Conference. He preached on the third verse of the letter of Jude where we are exhorted to 'contend earnestly for the faith once for all delivered to the people of God'.

As we listened, our hearts said, 'Yes. This is it. This is the message for today. This is the message we need to hear. This is the message we must never forget.'

As we seek the way forward, God's way for the 21st century, are we beginning to see that the way forward begins when when we go back to the Word of God, back to the Saviour, back to His Apostles?

What a wonderful model for ministry we have in Paul's message to the Ephesian elders! Here is a man who demands our attention. Here is a man who compels us to listen. He is a man of his own time, a man from the 1st century, yet his message is for our time. It is a message which calls us to take God seriously. It is a message which calls us to listen carefully to God's Word. Paul calls us to centre our lives on Christ. He calls us to commit ourselves to prayer.

Paul's ministry was a helpful ministry. It was a Gospel ministry. His ministry was a teaching ministry and it was a prayerful ministry.

(1) Paul's ministry was a helpful ministry. He tells us, in verse 20, that 'he kept back nothing that was helpful'. In his public preaching of God's Word and in his pastoral work in the homes of the people, Paul prayed that his ministry would help the people to grow in their knowledge of God, their love of God and their service of God.

Why was Paul's ministry such a helpful ministry?

It was helpful because it was real. He was a man living in the power of Christ's resurrection, a man who could truly say, 'For me, to live is Christ' (Philippians 1:21).

His ministry was helpful because it was a ministry of fearless preaching, faithful pastoral work and fervent prayer. Paul was fearless as he preached God's Word to the people. He was faithful in the ministry of bringing Christ to the people in their own homes. He was fervent in prayer as he asked God to bless the people.

I recall an occasion when I spoke at the Presbytery of Dunfermline. The Rev Dr Gordon Jenkins was about to take up a position in Edinburgh. I had been asked to pay tribute to his ministry at the North Parish Church, Dunfermline. Gordon was an enthusiastic supporter of Dunfermline Athletic. I used the letters of the team's nickname, the Pars, to describe Gordon's ministry. It was Ministry Anointed by the Renewing Spirit.

Ministry Anointed by the Renewing Spirit - this is where the helpfulness comes from. It comes from above. It comes from the Lord.

When we have done all that we can do, we must look away from ourselves to the Lord and say, 'It is not by might. It is not by power. It is by the Spirit of the Lord' (Zechariah 4:6).

When we look at all that has been achieved, we must learn to look away from ourselves to the Lord and say, from the heart, 'This is the Lord's doing and it is marvellous in our eyes' (Psalm 118:23).

This is helpful ministry - ministry which serves the purpose of God's salvation, ministry which depends on the presence of God's power, ministry which maintains the priority of God's glory. This is helpful ministry - bringing Christ to the people, bringing the people to Christ.

Helpful ministry - it is ministry that never forgets to say, 'Our help is in the Name of the Lord' (Psalm 124:8).

(2) Paul's ministry was a Gospel ministry. In verse 24, he describes his ministry. He tells us that he 'received this ministry from the Lord Jesus'. He tells us that it is a ministry of 'testifying to the Gospel of the grace of God'.

What is the Gospel? - It is the Good News: Christ has died for our sins, Christ has risen from the dead (1 Corinthians 15:3-4). Is the preaching of the Gospel simply the announcement of these facts? No! It is more than that. There is also the challenge of the Gospel, the call to repentance, the call to faith (v. 21).

God is not only telling us something. He is asking us something. Will you repent? Will you believe?

God is saying something to us - 'This is My beloved Son with whom I am well pleased. This is My beloved Son. Listen to Him'. He is also asking us to say something to Him - 'God, be merciful to me, a sinner' (Luke 18:13).

This is the prayer of repentance. This is the prayer of faith. We turn from sin. We turn to God. We take our sin to Jesus. We trust Him for forgiveness.

To every one who hears the Gospel, the question is asked, 'What will your response be?'

As I look back over my own spiritual journey, I am forever grateful to those who impressed on me the need to make my personal response to Jesus Christ. It was not enough to say, 'God so loved that He gave His only Son' (John 3:16). There needed to be something more personal - 'the Son of God loved me and gave Himself for me' (Galatians 2:20). It was not enough to say, 'Jesus Christ is the Saviour of the world' (John 4:42). There needed to be the personal confession of faith - 'Jesus Christ is my Saviour'.

Paul was a faithful and fearless preacher of the Gospel. If, in our generation, we are to follow his example, we must not hesitate to impress upon the people the necessity of 'repentance towards God and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ' (v. 21).

Earlier this year, I had the privilege of attending a service conducted by the Rev Dr Sam Hosain, now retired after thirteen years of fruitful ministry at John Knox Church in Stewarton, near Kilmarnock. In his sermon, Dr Hosain directed our attention to three verses in the letter to the Hebrews:

'without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins' (9:22),

'without faith it is impossible to please God' (11:6),

'without holiness no-one will see the Lord' (12:14).

In these three statements, we have the key features of Gospel ministry:

First, we are to hear the Gospel - the Good News that Christ died for our sins;

Second, we are to believe the Gospel - 'Believe in the Lord Jesus and you will be

saved' (Acts 16:31);

Third, we are to live the Gospel - Christ has died for us. Now He calls us to live for Him.

This is Gospel ministry - hearing the Gospel, believing the Gospel and living the Gospel. May God help us to be faithful to His Gospel - in our hearing, in our believing, in our living.

(3) Paul's ministry was a teaching ministry. In verse 27, Paul reminds the Ephesian elders that 'he had not hesitated to proclaim to them the whole will of God'.

In his book, Evangelism in the Early Church, Michael Green emphasizes the importance of 'teaching evangelism' (pp. 204-206). At the very beginning of the book, he speaks of his own commitment to both evangelism and teaching. His words, written in 1970, are still very relevant to our 21st century Church. This is what he says,

'Most evangelists are not very interested in theology; most theologians are not very interested in evangelism. I am deeply committed to both' (p. 7).

Deeply committed to both evangelism and teaching - what a good description of Paul's ministry! His ministry was a Gospel ministry, calling on men and women to come to Christ in repentance, to come to Christ in faith. His ministry was also a teaching ministry. He did not rest content with inviting people to make a new beginning with Christ. He called them to go on with the Lord. He called them to press on to maturity.

God has so much to say to us. There is so much more than the call for conversion. The Lord is calling us to walk with Him all the days of our life. True conversion is not just a one-off event. It is a lifelong experience of divine grace, a lifelong experience of turning to God in repentance, a lifelong experience of learning to trust in our Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ.

If this lifelong experience of God's salvation is to grow strong in our hearts and lives, we need 'the whole counsel of God'. We need solid teaching from the Word of God.

We need teaching which rebukes us when we move away from the paths of righteousness, teaching which corrects us, calling us back into the paths of righteousness.

We need teaching which will lead us in the paths of righteousness, teaching which will keep us walking in the paths of righteousness.

During the late 1990s, I began writing Daily Bible Reading Notes. The full set of notes covers the whole Bible - from Genesis to Revelation. Each quarterly booklet begins with these words of 'Introduction':

'Welcome to an exciting ... journey of discovery. On this journey, you will visit places you know well. You will also travel to places you hardly know at all. They will be places of blessing - places where you will meet with God and be blessed by Him ... May God bless you richly as you journey with Him to the many places of blessing found in His Word.'

The Christian life is a journey. On this journey, we are travelling with God and we are travelling in faith. On this journey, God has a plan for us. It is His perfect plan. He wants us to grow - in our knowledge of Him, in our faith in Him, in our love for Him.

God does not want us to remain 'babes in Christ'. He does not want us to remain content with 'the milk of the Word' (1 Peter 2:2). He wants us to move on to 'solid food' (Hebrews 5:12-14). He has given us 'the whole counsel of God' so that we can grow more and more like Christ, so that we can bring more and more glory to God.

We must never rest on our laurels. When the challenge of God's Word comes to us, calling us on to maturity, we dare not say, 'I'm a believer' as if that was the end of the matter. When God is calling us on to maturity, He is not asking, 'Are you a believer?' He is asking, 'Are you a growing believer? Are you growing in grace and in the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ?'

On this journey with God, this journey of faith, this journey of spiritual growth, may our whole life - in the 21st century - be a living echo of this great prayer from the 13th century:

'Day, by day, O dear Lord, three things I pray, to see You more clearly, to love You more dearly, to follow You more nearly, day by day'.

(4) Paul's ministry was a prayerful ministry. Paul did not only speak to the people. He also spoke to God. He spoke to the people for God and he spoke to God for the people. In his message to the Ephesian elders, Paul said, in verse 32, 'Now I commit you to God'. At the end of his message, 'he knelt down with all of them and prayed' (v.36).

Paul was a preacher. Paul was a pastor. Paul was a man of prayer. He prayed for the people. He prayed with the people. He prayed that they would receive God's grace. He prayed that they would know that all of their sins had been forgiven. He prayed that they would grow strong in their faith. He prayed that they would be sanctified, that they would live a Godly life, a Christ-like life, a Spirit-filled life, a life which brings glory to God.

How are we to live the kind of life which brings glory to God? - In his prayer for the Ephesians, Paul points us in the direction of a life that is full of God's blessing:

'I pray that you, being rooted and established in love, may have power, together with all the saints, to grasp how wide and long and high and deep is the love of Christ, and to know this love that surpasses knowledge - that you may be filled to the measure of all the fullness of God' (Ephesians 3:17-19).

Get to know how much the Lord loves you and you will be changed by His love. As you think of the Lord's great love for you, you will want to love Him more. The story of your life will be 'Loving Him who first loved me.'

God calls us to worship Him. He calls us to walk with Him. He calls us to be His witnesses. He calls us to be His workers. Can we ever hope to live such a God-centred life? We cannot do so in our strength. Without Christ, we can do nothing. With Christ, everything changes. We become a new creation in Christ Jesus. We receive new strength.

Paul speaks about this strengthening when he prays for the Ephesians:

'For this reason I kneel before the Father ... I pray that out of His glorious riches He may strengthen you with power through His Spirit in your inner being' (Ephesians 3:14, 16).

Paul was a man of action. He travelled from place to place, preaching here and preaching there. This is not, however, the full story of Paul's life. We must always remember that he was a man of prayer. From Paul's ministry, we learn this great lesson:

'The prayer of a righteous man is powerful and effective' (James 5:16).

There is such a clear connection in Scripture between prayer and blessing. We ask, 'Why is there not much blessing?' James tells us - 'You do not have because you do not ask God' (James 4:2). We wonder, 'How can we receive more of God's blessing?' Jesus tells us - 'Ask, and it will be given to you' (Matthew 7:7).

If we are to see God's blessing in our worship and witness, in our walk with God and our work for God, we must come to the Lord with this request, 'Lord, teach us to pray' (Luke 11:1).

We have looked together at the ministry of the Apostle Paul - a helpful ministry, a Gospel ministry, a teaching ministry, a prayerful ministry. May God help us to learn from this ministry. May we learn the great lesson contained in 2 Chronicles 7:14 - 'If My people, who are called by My Name, will humble themselves and pray and seek My face and turn from their wicked ways, then will I hear from heaven and will forgive their sin and heal their land.'

Teaching Evangelism

In the preface to his book, The Evangelism of the Early Church, Michael Green states a personal reason for writing the book:

“Most evangelists are not very interested in theology: most theologians are not very interested in evangelism. I am deeply committed to both. So the study of this subject was particularly congenial to me” (p.7).

Green’s book contains a brief but helpful section on “Teaching Evangelism” (pp.204-206).

Green’s emphasis on the unbreakable connection between theology and evangelism encourages us to develop an evangelistic theology.

A theology which does not lead to evangelism remains remote from both the Gospel of God and the need of human beings.

An evangelism which shows little interest in theological reflection tends to become rather superficial, lacking the depth and range of “teaching evangelism”.


Sharing our Faith Effectively

Philemon, Verse 6 - “that the sharing of your faith may become effective by the acknowledgment of every good thing which is in you in Christ Jesus”.
These words bring to mind several other verses of Scripture.
* “acknowledging every good thing … ” indicates that we are to share our faith in the spirit of thanksgiving, giving thanks to the Lord for all that He has done for us, all that He is doing for us and all that He will do for us.
When we find it difficult to share our faith, we must learn to stand upon God’s Word: “Thanks be to God, who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ” (1 Corinthians 15:57).
* “every good thing in you” brings to mind the wonderfully encouraging words of 2 Timothy 1:7 - “God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power and of love and of a sound mind”.
What a great encouragement it is to know that we can exchange our weakness - “fear” - for the Lord’s strength - “power … love … a sound mind”.
This is the fulfilment of God’s promise in Isaiah 40:31 - “Those who wait on the Lord shall renew their strength”.
The combination of “power” and “love” is important.
We might say that it is the power of love. It is the love of God at work. It is the power of God at work.
His love motivates us to reach out for Him. His power makes our witness effective for Him.
As well as power and love, there is also the blessing of “a sound mind”.
There are times when we have the opportunity to prepare a message from God’s Word.
We use our minds to think through what the Lord is saying to us and what He wants us to say to the people.
There are other times when we must think on our feet.
We must “always be ready to give a defence to everyone who asks for a reason for a hope that is in us”. We must do this “with meekness and fear” (1 Peter 3:15).
When we have to think on our feet, we must stand upon the Lord’s Word: “do not worry beforehand about what to say. Just say whatever is given you at the time, for it is not you speaking, but the Holy Spirit” (Mark 13:11).
God’s promise will be fulfilled as we learn in our study of God’s Word, to pray for “the renewal of our mind” (Romans 12:2) - “May the mind of Christ my Saviour live in me from day to day, by His love and power controlling all I do or say”.
We must never forget that the “power” and “love” come from the Lord and not from ourselves.
When there is an effective sharing of our faith, we must always remember this: “This is the Lord’s doing and it is marvellous in our eyes” (Psalm 118:23). This must be our testimony: “Not to us, O Lord, not to us, but to Your Name give glory, because of of Your mercy and Your truth” (Psalm 115:1).
* “every good thing” - Here, we are reminded of the great words of Paul in Ephesians 1:3 - “every spiritual blessing”.
Paul speaks here in a spirit of worship - “Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ”.
He gives thanks to the Lord who “has blessed us with every spiritual blessing”.
“Every spiritual blessing” is to be found “in Christ”.
* “in Christ Jesus” - The final words of Philemon 6 remind us that any good things “in us” have come from Christ.
Paul tells us that, in ourselves, “there is no good thing” (Romans 7:18).
The good things are “in Christ Jesus”.
He gives them to us as He gives Himself to us.
If we are to be effective witnesses for Christ, we must learn to “abide in Christ”. We must never forget this: “without Him we can do nothing”. Abiding in Christ - this is the way of “bearing much fruit” - “May the Word of God dwell richly in my heart from hour to hour, so that all may see I triumph only through His power”.
* There will be times when we must share our faith with those who are going through a time of great suffering. If our words are to be helpful to them, we must pray for the strengthening of our own faith so that we are able to share the Lord’s strength with them: “May the peace of God my Father rule my heart in everything, that I may be calm to comfort sick and sorrowing”.
* An effective sharing of our faith is a sharing of the love of Jesus. We must pray that His love will shine through as we witness for Him: “May the love of Jesus fill me, as the waters fill the sea; Him exalting, self abasing, this is victory”.
* Persevering in the way of faith is not easy. We must take care that we do not lose “our first love” (Revelation 2:4). We must keep our eyes on Jesus. He will give us the strength to continue in the way of faithful obedience: “May I run the race before me, strong and brave to face the foe, looking unto Jesus as I onward go”.


Local Church Evangelism


Here are some thoughts from the "Introduction" to Local Church Evangelism, edited by David Wright and Alastair Gray.

A Definition

"Evangelism may be defined briefly as the God-given task of presenting the good news of Jesus Christ in the power of the Holy Spirit in order that men and women and children may come to trust in God through him, accept him as their Saviour and serve him as their King in the fellowship of his Church in the world. It is concerned with communicating a specific message - a message that is not only about Jesus Christ but is Jesus Christ - with the aim of winning those who receive it to his allegiance" (p. 9).

A Reminder
"The congregation renewed for mission is God's primary evangelistic agency" (p. 10).

Looking up to God and looking out to our community

Here are some more thoughts from Local Church Evangelism, edited by David Wright and Alastair Gray.

Worship comes first.
""Praise is the primary form of the communication, the sheer enjoyment of the grace of God in our lives - all other communication is an overflow of this, the spread of its scent, affirming in appropriate ways, in various situations, the content and delight of praising God" (p. 49).

Worship leads to Witness.
"the church should be united in love and purpose, wide open to the Spirit of Jesus in prayer and with the outward look of openness to others in love" (p. 28).

Come to Christ and Go for Christ.
"Jesus says both 'I am the light of the world' ... and 'You are the light of the world'" (p. 43).

Service, Prayer, Love and Witness
"It is the total ministry of service, prayer, love and witness, throughout the year, which is used to bring new life to the parish" (Local Church Evangelism, edited by David Wright and Alastair Gray, p. 85).
To be reminded of our calling to be faithful in service, prayer, love and witness is to be reminded of our failure.
When, however, we look beyond the inadequacies of our service, prayer, love and witness, we catch a a glimpse of the faithfulness of God - "If we are faithless, He remains faithful" (2 Timothy 2:13).
In the presence of the God of "great faithfulness", we are reminded that we have "received this ministry by the mercy of God" (Lamentations 3:22; 2 Corinthians 4:1).
We have "received mercy" so that "we might proclaim the praises of Him who called us out of darkness into His marvellous light" (1 Peter 2:9-10).
"Shine, Jesus, shine, fill this land with the Father's glory; blaze, Spirit, blaze, set our hearts on fire ... ". These are not only words to be sung. It's a life to be lived. They are not only words for the mountain-top experience - the exuberance of praise. It's an all-year round life, a life of service, prayer, love and witness. Let's live the life and see the difference it makes!

How are we to live as God's people in today's world?

* The past and the present

Jesus says, "I did not come to abolish, but to fulfill" (Matthew 5:17).

We must learn from the past without getting locked in the past. We must not immerse ourselves in the past without interpreting our past for the sake of the present. We respect those who have gone before us without simply repeating what they have done.

* The people and the place

"you are Christ's body" (1 Corinthians 12:27).

The place where we worship is less important than the people we are. The greatest change God is looking for in His Church is the change of heart - "Change my heart, O God, make it ever true, change my heart, O God, may I be like you". This is real change. This is the change that really makes a difference. Everything changes when the heart is changed.

* The pride and the praise

"God has chosen the foolish things of this world to shame the wise, and God has chosen the things the weak things of the world to shame the things which are strong" (1 Corinthians 1:27).

When God is at work among us, changing our hearts and re-shaping our lives, there will be less pride in ourselves and more praise to God. Everything does not revolve around ourselves. Centred upon Christ, the great goal of our life will be to say from the heart, "To God be the glory! Great things He hath done ... Praise the Lord! Let the earth hear His voice."

Rebuilding, Revival, Restoration

Here's a sermon outline from John Macleod , minister of Loudoun Church, Newmilns (Church of Scotland - Presbytery of Irvine and Kilmarnock).

Preaching on Psalm 85, he spoke about the principle of rebuilding, the prayer for revival and the promise of restoration.

There's work for us to do. As we work, we must also pray. Working and praying, let us look to the Lord to send the blessing.

Labels:

"Some key themes in "Church without walls" (a Church of Scotland Report)

A Call to Prayer

The Church Without Walls Report was presented to the General Assembly in 2001. The Report is an attempt to look for fresh ways of encouraging and supporting congregations in the twentieth-first century. The Report invites all of us in the Church to think about where we have come from, where we are and where we ought to be heading.


The Church Without Walls does not seek to impose a single, detailed pattern for every congregation. This point is emphasized in the opening summary of the Report's contents:
'We place into the hands of God's people the opportunity to live out our faith, each according to our own uniqueness, made in the image of God. It is our hope and prayer that the Report, together with the many initiatives within the Church at present, will stimulate the Church to face the future in faith and hope' (9).

The Report begins with the words of Jesus, 'Follow Me' (9). Christ calls us to follow Him. He invites us to be changed by Him. He calls us to move forward with Him. Moving forward with Christ and being changed by Him will involve listening to His voice.

Encouraging us to listen to Christ's voice, the Report recommends congregations' to 'study, reflect on and live by one Gospel for one year in the first instance, and let Jesus shape the life and structure of the congregation' (18).

The change which is being called for is spiritual change. This is the change Christ is looking for. The Report emphasizes this point: 'The heart of reform is the reform of the heart. The first proposal for reform is a call to prayer' (37).

In one of 'the many initiatives within the Church at present', the Board of National Mission has produced a thirty-four page booklet entitled 'Lord, Help us to Pray!'. With this booklet, as with the eighty pages of the Church Without Walls Report, it is possible to feel overwhelmed - 'This is all too much for us!'.

Like the Church Without Walls Report, the booklet on prayer recognizes the uniqueness of each congregation: 'Go at your own pace. You should not imagine that you are expected to implement all, or even most, of the ideas in this booklet. What you will find contained here are simply guidelines and suggestions' ('Lord, Help us to Pray!', 16).

The Presbytery of Irvine and Kilmarnock has provided notes to help us in our study of the Church Without Walls Report. The recommendations for Year 1 are chiefly directed towards Kirk Sessions. The recommendations for Year 2 are directed towards congregations. Beginning with the Kirk Session emphasizes the important part elders play within the life of the congregation.

We are to follow Christ. We are to help others to follow Christ.
The first of the issues raised by the Presbytery's notes concerns the training of the elders for spiritual leadership.

Recently, we provided each elder (at Darvel) with a copy of the booklet, 'The Eldership: A Training Manual'. It is a booklet which lays the foundations for following Christ and helping others to follow Him.

By emphasizing 'The Biblical Basis for the Eldership' (9), it strikes a similar note to the Church Without Walls Report with its emphasis on listening carefully to what God is saying to us in His Word. Its emphasis on 'Spiritual Leadership' (34) is strikingly similar to the Church Without Walls Report's statement: 'The heart of reform is the reform of the heart. The first proposal for reform is a call to prayer' (9).

When we lay the right foundations - 'We will devote ourselves to prayer and the ministry of the Word' (Acts 6:4) - we can move forward with God, confident that He will lead us in His perfect way.

We may be very uncertain about how God will lead us forward. If, however, we are serious about following Jesus Christ, we will know the truth of these words rom Susan Brown's booklet, 'Church Without Walls: Working it out Together' - 'People at prayer learn to live within the purposes of God with patient hope' (27).

We have thought about important matters. Now, we must pray about them. We have spoken about important matters. Now, we must speak to God about them. This is not only a conversation among ourselves. We must bring God into the conversation. We must listen to what He is saying to us. We must speak to Him, seeking His help.

Let's join together in a final prayer taken from Susan Brown's booklet, 'Church Without Walls: Working it out Together':
'Lord Jesus Christ, you call us to follow You into the familiar and into the unknown, to places we find easy, and others we find difficult, to follow You tirelessly to the ends of the earth. We need Your strength, Your courage. We need the help of Your Holy Spirit to fill and inspire us, drawing us closer to You, and to one another in You, for Your sake. Father God, You have always gone before Your people, and You go before us. Grant us the courage to follow closely, to walk where You walk and do what You do. May Your will be done on earth as it is in heaven, for the sake of Jesus Christ our Lord' (7,28).

Without Christ we can do nothing.

Looking together at the Church Without Walls Report - this is an ongoing process of thinking about where we have come from, where we are and where we ought to be heading.

I hope that thinking about these matters will help us to become more devoted followers of Christ. I hope they will help us to grow in our commitment to providing spiritual leadership within our congregations and communities.

We begin by emphasizing the vital importance of prayer: 'There must be a revival of praying before there can be a reaping of the harvest' (Sammy Tippet).

This call to prayer is an important reminder to us that 'Without Christ we can do nothing' (John 15:5). If the Church's worship and mission is to be blessed by God, we must bring it before Him in prayer.
Looking at the Church Without Walls Report together with the booklet, The Eldership: A Training Manual, we have noted the important part which must be played by the elders if there is to be a revival of God's work in our congregation and community.

The third and fourth chapters of this training manual focus on 'Biblical Teaching on Ordination' and 'Spiritual Leadership'. The first of these chapters makes reference to the Westminster Confession of Faith. The Presbyterian Church in Ireland has produced a study manual on the Westminster Confession of Faith - Firm Foundations: A Faith for Today's Church.

We are to be today's Church without losing contact with the firm foundations upon which our faith is built.
Being today's Church will not mean change for change's sake. It will mean being changed by the God who has given us firm foundations for our faith. It will mean rediscovering the biblical and spiritual priorities which have too often been forgotten.

We must build on God's Word. We must learn to walk with God's Spirit. This is the kind of change we must seek. We must not search for superficial novelty when God is looking for real change, a change in our attitude towards Him.

The Church Without Walls Report invites us to think about what it will mean for us to follow Christ in today's world. The Report invites us to do this through a careful and attentive study of one of the Gospels. In our study of Luke's Gospel, we have noted that Jesus 'calls sinners to repentance' (5:32).

If we are to be changed by Jesus, we must learn to see ourselves as 'sinners' who have fallen short of God's perfect plan for us. We must pray for real change. We must ask God to give us a spirit of repentance. We must pray that God will give us the strength to turn to Him with our whole heart.
Seeking the right kind of change will mean recognizing where truly spiritual change comes from. It comes from God. It comes from listening to God's Word. It comes when we are obedient to the voice of God's Spirit.

The fourth chapter of Eldership: A Training Manual emphasizes the importance of 'Spiritual Leadership'. It begins by pointing out that 'the Church is a spiritual fellowship'. It is different from any other organization.

When we begin our meetings with the reading of God's Word and prayer, we are not simply going through the motions of religious ritual. We are recognizing our need of God's help. We need to hear what God is saying to us through His Word. We need to receive God's strength as we call upon Him in prayer. We are acknowledging that our meeting is much more than a conversation among ourselves.We are bringing God into the conversation. We are letting Him be the most important Voice in the conversation. Before we listen to any other voice, we are listening to the Voice of God. Before we speak to one another, we are speaking to God.

If there is to be a real input from God into our meetings, into our congregation and community, our worship and mission, our reading from God's Word and our speaking to Him in prayer must lie at the very heart of our life. We are to follow Jesus. In our study of Luke's Gospel, we have seen that Jesus' whole life was steeped in God's Word and prayer. We do not live by bread alone but by every Word of God (4:4; Matthew 4:4). Like Jesus, we are to find 'a solitary place' (4:42) - a place where we can be alone with God.

It is important that we concentrate on what God is saying to us concerning His Church and our place within it as elders. This will shape our thinking, giving us a real concentration on our true purpose as God's people and God's servants. We must pray that the love of God will reach us and that the glory of God becomes our great aim.

When this happens, we will receive strength from the Lord. We will be equipped by Him for the privileged responsibility of providing true spiritual leadership within our congregations and communities..

Our desire to see people of all ages brought into the fellowship of God's people will grow as we ourselves are learning to love the Lord more. Our commitment to this work of bringing people into the fellowship of God's people will increase as our own commitment to serving the Lord grows in strength. We must remember this: without Christ we can do nothing.

One of the Church Without Walls leaflets issued by our own Presbytery (Year 1 - Congregational Life - Commendation 5) ends with the words of Jeremiah 24:7 - 'I will give them a heart to know Me that I am the Lord'. Let us pray that this promise of God will be fulfilled in our own lives. Let us pray that it will be fulfilled in the lives of more and more of the people in our congregations and communities.

Serving the Lord with Gladness

'Each person is a gift from God to the Church to be celebrated and nurtured ... The word 'celebrated' is used deliberately because it emphasizes the joyful generosity which is needed to give freedom to people, so that they can grow and became fruitful' (The Church Without Walls, Presbytery paper, Year 1, Commendation 4).

The use of the word 'celebration' emphasizes the fact that we are to 'serve the Lord with gladness' (Psalm 100:2). The call to 'serve the Lord with gladness' is addressed to everyone - 'All people that on earth do dwell'. We, who have accepted God's call to become leaders within His Church, are to give a lead to others.

By serving the Lord with gladness, we are to set an example which will encourage others to join us in serving the Lord with gladness. Our Presbytery held a special service for elders. It was entitled, 'A Celebration of Eldership'. In this service, the letters of the word 'elders' were used to highlight key features of the work of the eldership - Eldership, Listening, Disciples, Educators, Responsive, Support.

These words set the eldership within both our relationship with God - we are to listen to God's Word, we are to live as disciples of Christ, we are to be responsive to God's Spirit - and our responsibility to the people of God whom we are called to serve in Christ's Name - as Christ's disciples, we are to listen to people with a view to responding in a way that will give support to them as they seek to live in obedience to God's Word as followers of Jesus.

The two sides of our life as God's servants - listening to what God has to say to us through His Word and speaking His Word to those to whom we are called to give support in the way of faith and obedience - are highlighted in Isaiah 50:4.

'The Sovereign Lord has given me an instructed tongue, to know the word that sustains the weary. He wakens me morning by morning, wakens my ear to listen like one being taught'.

'Knowing the word that sustains the weary' - This is a very important phrase which provides an apt description of the heart of the work of the eldership. We are to exercise a ministry of encouragement.

Keeping our eyes on Jesus

It is entirely appropriate that we should lay a strong emphasis on the important role that elders must play in the life of the Church.

We must, however, stress that, as elders, we are called to be servants. Our work as elders is concerned with the growth of faith within our congregation and community. The question, 'What kind of elders does God want us to be - as individuals and as a group who are called to serve God?' is vitally connected with the further questions, 'What kind of Church is God calling us to be?' and 'How can we serve Him best in our communities?'

This is the direction in which the Presbytery notes on 'Church Without Walls' for Year 2 - 2003 take us. Most of the recommendations for Year 1 were directed to Kirk Sessions. All of the recommendations for Year 2 are directed to congregations.
Recommendation 1 in Year 2 concerns focusing on Jesus by studying, reflecting on and living by one of the Gospels. What will it mean 'to be shaped by the Gospel of Jesus Christ'? It means this - 'the lives of individuals and congregations being shaped by the "mind of Christ"'.

We are encouraged to look beyond our own local situation, to see the broader picture of what God is doing as He calls His Church to live in obedience to the words of Christ - 'Follow Me': 'The shape of the Church in each village, town and city of Scotland will emerge as we take time to "follow Jesus" through a saturation in the Gospel stories'.
A recent 'Church Without Walls' video and accompanying booklet deals with five of the Report's major themes. The first theme - 'The Spiritual Journey' - provides an apt description of what we sought to do at Darvel in our Sunday morning studies of the Gospel of Luke.

We are travelling with Jesus, going where Jesus goes, observing what He says and does as He travels from place to place, learning from Him as we accompany Him on His journey. It is also an apt description of what we sought to do at Darvel with the distribution of 'Daily Bible Readings' (see my Christ in all the Scriptures blog).

This is the point that is made in the 'Introduction' to these notes:
'Welcome to an exciting three-year journey of discovery. On this journey, you will visit places you know well. You will also travel to places you hardly know at all. They will be places of blessing - places where you will meet with God and be blessed by Him ... May God bless you richly as you journey with Him to the many places of blessing found in His Word'.
The Daily Bible Readings refer to 'a three-year journey'.
The Church Without Walls recommendation speaks about spending 'one year in the first instance'. The time-scale is not the important thing. It is the journey. It is travelling with the Lord. This is a life-long journey. We will never reach a point where we can say, 'I've reached the end of my journey. I've travelled far enough'.

In this journey, there will be times of joy and times of disappointment, times when we are aware that the Lord is very near to us and times when, it seems to us, that the Lord is very far away (the truth is that He is near to us even though we have wandered away from Him). On this journey, we must keep our eyes on the Lord. If we take our eyes off Him, we will stumble and fall.

When you are tempted to take your eyes off Jesus, remember these words of encouragement:
'When the road is rough and steep, fix your eyes upon Jesus.
He alone has power to keep. fix your eyes upon Him.
Jesus is a gracious Friend, One on whom you can depend.
He is faithful to the end, fix your eyes upon Him'.

I close with some words from Luke's Gospel which we have reached - the parable of the sower (8:1-15). They are words of realism. The seed of God's Word does not always fall on good soil. They are words of hope. Sometimes, the seed of God's Word will fall on good soil. Sometimes, the seed of God's Word will bear much good fruit. They are words of challenge. We must keep on sowing the seed of God's Word into the hearts and lives of the people of our community.

There will be no spiritual harvest if we do not keep on sowing the seed of God's Word. Without the faithful sowing of His seed, there will be no fruitful gathering in of His harvest. May God help us to be faithful to Him. May God give us the privilege of being fruitful for Him.

Christ at the Centre

Focusing on the Presbytery paper - Year 2, Commendation1, we emphasized the goal of our careful study of the Gospel of Luke. We are to 'let Jesus shape the life and structure of the congregation'.

By embarking on a major study of the Gospel of Luke - 'one year in the first instance', we recognize that bringing Christ into the centre of the congregation and keeping Him at the centre of the congregation is long-term work.

Normally, 'one year' is a long time for a series of sermons. When, however, we are trying to take the Gospel of Luke seriously, it becomes clear that the phrase 'in the first instance' is a very important phrase. There is so much to learn. Soon, a year seems a short time.

Our study of the Gospel of Luke - however long it may take - is just a part of a much longer project. We are learning to follow Jesus. This is a lifelong project.

Bringing Christ into the centre, keeping Christ at the centre - What will this mean for us? This is the question that concerns us now, as we turn our attention to Presbytery Paper - Year 2, Commendation 2.

We are to serve our local community for the sake of Jesus. We are not here just for those who are regular worshippers. Our worship is to strengthen us for the task of being Chris's witnesses to the people of our community.

The Presbytery Paper speaks of God's purpose for the local congregation: 'The local congregation is the space where Christian life is nurtured in practical discipleship, earthed in the concrete realities of local life. The congregation shows the way by serving alongside the community and inviting others to become followers of Christ'.

Alongside this 'challenge of becoming a missionary congregation', the Paper issues a warning: 'We must take care that we do not 'develop a fortress mentality of isolation'. If we allow ourselves to slip into this kind of attitude, we will be 'no longer a servant of the Kingdom of God'. We are to be 'a worshipping, witnessing community', 'a real community of faith', 'a Gospel community'.

Without the deepening of our faith in Christ as we build upon His Gospel, there can be 'no communication of the Gospel' to others. When we worship God, we must always seek His strength so that we can more effectively fulfill our calling to be His witnesses in our community.

At the heart of the ministry of the local congregation, there is to be the ministry of friendship. The Presbytery Paper - Year 2, Commendation 3 - emphasizes this point by drawing attention to Jesus as our 'Friend'. We are to pray that, through our friendship, others will find the greatest Friend of all, our Lord Jesus Christ.

People will come to Christ as they catch a glimpse of Him shining through our friendship. In Christ, there is 'faith, hope and love'. If these things are real in 'the Bible of our lives, the only 'Bible' many people ever read, we will be Christ's witnesses with the power of a changed life, a life that is centred on Christ, a life that is seeking His glory and the advancement of His Kingdom.

When people begin to see Christ in us, 'the Word made flesh' in our lives, they will sit up and take notice. They will be drawn to us and - more importantly - they will be drawn to the Saviour.

Shaped by the Gospel

Circles within circles, with Christ at the centre - this phrase sums up our approach to the Church Without Walls Report. We begin with a small circle by looking at ourselves as elders. As we explore this theme, we see that this smaller circle - eldership - is enclosed within a larger circle - the congregation. Beyond the local congregation, there is another larger circle - the parish.

The Presbytery papers - Year 2, Commendations 4 & 5 - invite us to look out further to two even larger circles - the created world and the worldwide mission of the Church. As we look at the various circles of the Christian life, we must never forget to keep Christ at the centre.

The Church Without Walls Report emphasizes this point when it speaks about being 'shaped by the Gospel', 'living out the story of Jesus' and 'living out the spirituality of grace'. Christ is to be at the centre of our work as elders in this congregation and parish. As we look out to the created world and the Church's worldwide mission, we are to look out with the eyes of Christ.

The change which Christ makes in those who love Him is a far-reaching change. It begins with our personal response to His love, but it does not end there. Personal experence of Christ's love leads to a deep appreciation of the world that God has created for us.

The hymn, 'Loved with everlasting love', makes this point very well. It begins with our personal experience of Christ's love: 'Loved with everlasting love, led by grace that love to know ... In a love, which cannot cease, I am His, and He is mine'.
It goes on to emphasize that knowing Christ's love changes our view of God's creation: 'Heaven above is softer blue, earth around is sweeter green; something lies in every hue, Christless eyes have never seen: birds with gladder songs o'erflow. flowers with deeper beauty shine, since I know as now I know, I am His, and He is mine' (Mission Praise, 452).
The same principle also applies to our commitment to the support of the Church's worldwide mission. The more we rejoice in Christ's love for ourselves, the more we will appreciate His love for all people everywhere: 'Christ died not for our sins only, but also for the sins of the whole world' (1 John 2:2).

The Church Without Walls Report emphasizes that our concern for the created world and the Church's worldwide mission is to be an act of friendship. All of our relationships are to be 'Shaped by Friendship'. The Report develops this theme under the following headings - Friendship with fellow members; Friendship with the next generation; Friendship with the searcher; Friendship with the community; Friendship with fellow leaders; Friendship with other Churches; Friendship with rich and poor; Friendship with the World Church; Friendship with God's creation.

Where are we to learn such friendship? If we are to be 'Shaped by Friendship', we need to be 'Shaped by the Gospel'. When we think of friendship, we think of Jesus:
'What a Friend we have in Jesus, all our sins and griefs to bear! ... Can we find a Friend so faithful, who will all our sorrows share?' (Mission Praise, 746).
This is the Friendship which is to shape all of our life. Getting to know Jesus, the greatest Friend of all, our life is 'shaped by His Friendship'.

This will happen as we learn to pray:
'Fill Thou our life, O Lord my God, in every part with praise ... Not for the lip of praise alone, nor even the praising heart, We ask, but for a life made up of praise in every part' (Church Hymnary, 457).

Building on the Gospel

‘The Church “works” where people join together, building relationships with each other and the community to which they belong. It is through these relationships that the Gospel is spread.

In each place the Church is different. There is no one model that fits all. We rejoice in the diversity within the Church. We celebrate and encourage it’ (Church Without Walls Report, p.8).

People joining together, building relationships with each other, building relationships with their local community - these are the ways in which the Gospel is spread. People joining together, building relationships with each other, building relationships with their local community - this is to be more than a social thing. It is to be a matter of spiritual growth.

We are to join together on the basis of the Gospel, building relationships which reflect our common desire to ‘grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ’ (2 Peter 3:18), building relationships which will help the people of our own community ‘to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth’ (1 Timothy 2:4).

We recognize that ‘in each place the Church is different’. We acknowledge that ‘there is no one model that fits all. We rejoice in ‘the diversity within the Church’. We serve Christ in the local Church. This is our privilege - ‘The local congregation stands as a sign of God’s commitment to that place’ - and our responsibility - ‘It is vital that congregations look at and listen to their locality’ (Church Without Walls Report, p.19).

Serving Christ in the local Church, we echo the words of Paul to the Church at Corinth - we are ‘your servants for Jesus’ sake’ (2 Corinthians 4:5). We are ‘servants of Christ’, ‘servants of God’ (2 Corinthians 6:5; 11:23). While we recognize the local aspect in our life of serving Christ, we must never forget that we are to be in the world but ‘not of the world’ (John 17:15-16).

We must always remember the words of Paul: ‘Don’t let the world squeeze you into its own mould’. God is calling us on to ‘the goal of true maturity’. He is calling us to ‘be transformed by the renewal of your mind’, to ‘prove what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect ‘ (Romans 12:2).

We become what God wants us to be as we build on the common feature in every true Church - ‘the Gospel’. We build on the Gospel when we ‘believe in the Gospel’ (Mark 1:15). We build on the Gospel as we ‘preach the Gospel’ (Mark 16:15). The Church Without Walls Report focuses our attention on the important principles which must guide us as we seek to build on the Gospel.

‘The Church exists by the grace of God and for the glory of God’ (p.10). We rejoice in ‘the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ’ - ‘Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners’, ‘God showed His love towards us in that while we were still sinners Christ died for us’ (2 Corinthians 8:9; 1 Timothy 1:15; Romans 5:8). As we consider the ‘amazing grace’, let us say, from our hearts, ‘To God the glory!’ (Mission Praise, 31,708).

The Church is to ‘be shaped by worship and mission’ (p.31). We are to say, ‘To God be the glory!’ (Worship). We are also to say, ‘Let the earth hear His voice’ (Mission). As well as singing ‘the songs of God’s people’, we must also call upon the people of our community to ‘come to the Father through Jesus the Son and give Him the glory’ for ‘the great things He has done’ (Mission Praise, 708).

If the earth is to hear the Lord’s voice, it must hear the Word of the Lord from those who have begun ‘to listen for the still, small voice of the Spirit’. If we are to hear the Lord’s voice and speak His Word to others, we must follow the pathway of ‘obedience’, travelling ‘the humble way of the Cross’.

When we do this, our voice will be ‘the prophetic voice’, ‘that authentic voice of wisdom’ which will be God’s Word to our communities (p.35).

Labels:

Posts from "The Theology of G C Berkouwer" blog

Posts which were originally posted at "The Theology of G C Berkouwer " blog can now be found at this blog. The articles from that came from that blog were posted here between 2nd and 5th March.
Most of the articles have been tagged "Berkouwer".

Labels:

The character of God and the work of Christ in John McLeod Campbell's "The Nature of the Atonement"

When we consider the connection between the character of God and the work of Christ in the theology of McLeod Campbell, we must ask the question, “What are we to make of his repudiation of the notion of ‘punishment’?

He distinguishes between pain “as a penal infliction” and pain “as a condition and form of holiness and love under the pressure of our sin and its consequent misery.” He insists that we will only understand “the essence of the sacrifice and its atoning virtue” when we think in terms of “holiness and love” rather than “a penal infliction” (p. 118).

Are we really compelled to choose between the holy love of God and the punishment of sin?

We may appreciate McLeod Campbell’s emphasis on Christ “seeing sin and sinners with God’s eyes” without accepting his radical rejection of any penal element in the atonement.

The atonement concerns how Christ viewed sin and sinners. It also concerns how God viewed the crucified Christ. He looks upon His beloved Son and He sees sin laid upon Him (2 Corinthians 5:21).

We may learn from McLeod Campbell’s emphasis on Christ’s pain as “holiness and love under the pressure of our sin”. We also observe that part of Christ’s pain was the God-forsakenness expressed in the cry of dereliction: “My God, my God, why hast Thou forsaken Me? (Matthew 27:46).

Was Christ mistaken in feeling He had been forsaken by God? Or, was He really forsaken by God as He took our sin upon Himself?

If we conclude that He really was forsaken by God, we must question the adequacy of McLeod Campbell’s view.

Can the God - forsakenness - if it is real - be understood simply as “the pressure of our sin and its consequent misery”? Is it not also a pressure laid upon Christ from above?

How are we to interpret the ideas of wrath and satisfaction?

McLeod Campbell does not reject the ideas of “the wrath of God against sin” and “satisfaction … due to divine justice”. He interprets these ideas in a way that excludes “the idea of the Son of God … enduring a penal infliction in they very act of honouring the Father”. He stresses that “Christ in dealing with God on behalf of men, must be conceived of as dealing with the righteous wrath of God against sin, and as according to it that which was due.” Christ’s “dealing with the Father in relation to our sins” - “a perfect confession of our sins” - is understood in connection with His holy “condemnation of sin”. He describes Christ’s confession as “a perfect Amen in humanity to the judgment of God on the sin of man” (pp. 134-136).

It would be quite inappropriate to dismiss McLeod Campbell’s view as a ‘moral influence theory’. Though appreciative of certain aspects of the ‘moral influence theory’, he does emphasize the Godward aspects of the atonement. His view differs from Anselm’s view. Nevertheless, he does interpret Anselmic concepts rather than dispensing with them in favour of a ‘moral influence theory’.

Anselm’s view has been described as “the commercial theory of sin.”

We need not react to Anselm’s one-sidedness by formulating another one-sided theory. Scripture does use ‘commercial’ language: “the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord” (Romans 6:23). Christ has received “the wages of sin … death” on our behalf so that we, through Him, might receive “the gift of God … eternal life”. It is questionable whether this understanding of the atonement can be maintained where the idea of punishment is completely abandoned.

The revelation of ‘holiness’ and ‘love’

Concerning Christ’s suffering, McLeod Campbell writes, “God is revealed in it and not merely in connection with it; God’s righteousness and condemnation of sin, being in the suffering, and not merely what demands it - God’s love also being in the suffering, and not merely what submits to it.” He speaks thus of the need for atonement: “The entrance of sin has been the entrance of sorrow, - not to the sinful only, and as the punishment of sin, but also to the holy and the loving, and as what holiness and love must feel in the presence of sin” (p. 141).

McLeod Campbell’s emphasis on God being revealed in Christ’s suffering is to be welcomed. It does, however, appear that he is guilty of caricature here. The suffering of Christ reveals the character of God - His holiness and His love: He is “just and the justifier of Him who believes in Jesus” (Romans 3:26). This revelation of God’s character in Christ’s suffering is not bound up with McLeod Campbell’s rejection of the concept of punishment. We need not imagine that there is a loss of perspective concerning God’s character the moment we admit to a penal element in the atonement.

McLeod Campbell’s statement concerning “sorrow, - not to the sinful only … but also to the holy and loving” is to be welcomed for its Godward aspect. Nevertheless, the contrast between “what holiness and love must feel in the presence of sin” and “the punishment of sin” is rather one0sided. In Genesis 2:17, we read, “But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it:for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.” We do not hear only of God’s feelings about sin and sinners. we also hear about the punishment of sin. When, in Romans 5, we read of Christ as “the second Adam”, the question arises whether Christ’s work can be understood in its true relation to God’s declaration - “Thou shalt surely die” - if the concept of punishment is abandoned.

Comparison of McLeod Campbell and Calvin (Institutes, Two, XVI, 5)

McLeod Campbell takes care to set Christ’s sufferings within the context of His whole life. He regards ‘as included in expression, “a sacrifice for sin,” what Christ endured in this witnessing for God”. He sees the death of Christ as being “necessary to the perfection of His witness-bearing for the Father”. He carefully distinguishes this view of Christ’s sufferings from the view which gives “these sufferings… a place in the atonement … on the entirely different ground that they were a part of what our Lord endured in bearing the punishment of our sins” (p. 132).

Here, we find McLeod Campbell echoing Calvin’s teaching regarding “the whole course of obedience”: “When it is asked then how Christ, by abolishing sin, removed the enmity between God and us, and purchased a righteousness which made Him favourable and kind to us, it may be answered generally, that He accomplished this by the whole course of His obedience.”

Calvin expands on this - ” … at His baptism He declared that a part of righteousness was fulfilled by His yielding obedience … from the moment when He assumed the form of a servant, He began, in order to redeem us, to pay the price of deliverance.”

Calvin lays special emphasis on the death of Christ - “Scripture, however, the more certainly to define the mode of salvation, ascribes it peculiarly and specially to the death of Christ.”

On the “mode of death”, we may ask whether McLeod Campbell’s view is as adequate as Calvin’s. Calvin writes, “Had he been cut off by assassins, or slain in a seditious tumult, there could have been no kind of satisfaction in such a death. But when He is placed as a criminal at the bar, where witnesses are brought to give evidence against Him, and the mouth of the judge condemns Him to die, we see Him sustaining the character of an offender and evil-doer … Why was it so? That He might bear the character of a sinner.”

Calvin stresses that He was acquitted by the same lips that condemned Him … we perceive Christ representing the character of a sinner, while, at the same time, His innocence shines forth, and it becomes manifest that He suffers for another’s and not for His own crime.”

How does McLeod Campbell’s view of Christ’s death compare with Calvin’s?

We may welcome McLeod Campbell’s teaching that Christ’s death is “a manifestation by the Son of what our sins are to the Father’s heart” (p. 133). Nevertheless, we must ask whether his theology would have been more Biblical if he had maintained the conception of punishment expressed by Calvin - “Our acquittal is in this - that the guilt which makes us liable to punishment was transferred to the head of the Son of God (Is, 53:12).”

Christ’s obedience

McLeod Campbell describes Christ’s obedience as “the essence and substance of the atonement.” He refers to the words of Hebrews 10:9 - “Lo, I have come to do Thy will, O God” - as “the great key-word on the subject of the atonement” (p. 124).

By emphasizing Christ’s obedience, McLeod Campbell makes the important point that Christ’s death should not be isolated from the whole of His life. His death for us is the outcome of His life of perfect holiness and perfect love, His life offered to God in perfect obedience. He was “obedient unto death, even the death of the cross” (Philippians 2:8).

When we compare McLeod Campbell’s understanding of Christ’s obedience with the traditional theological distinction between His active obedience and His passive obedience, we must question the adequacy of his teaching. Has he not overemphasized Christ’s active obedience?

In Isaiah 53:6 - “the Lord hath laid upon Him the iniquity of us all” - , we read about Christ’s ‘passive’ obedience, his willingness to have our iniquity laid upon Him. It would seem that there is here a dimension to Christ’s obedience which is hardly captured in McLeod Campbell’s understanding of Christ’s doing the will of God by seeing sin and the sinner with God’s eyes.

There are other “great key-word(s)” of the atonement besides Hebrews 10:9. To those other great key-words, McLeod Campbell might have paid closer attention.

McLeod Campbell’s teaching concerning Christ’s “repentance” and Christ’ “confession”

McLeod Campbell describes Christ’s confession as “a perfect Amen in humanity to the judgment of God on the sin of man” (p. 136) .

He describes this confession as a “response (that) has all the elements of a perfect repentance in humanity for all the sin of man excepting the personal consciousness of sin”. He contrasts two alternatives: “either to endure for sinners an equivalent punishment, or to experience in reference to their sin, and present to God on their behalf, an adequate sorrow and repentance.” He contends that “the latter equivalent … is surely the higher and more excellent, being a moral and spiritual satisfaction” (p. 137).

Here, McLeod Campbell does not actually call Christ’s confession “repentance”. What he does say is this: Christ’s confession “has all the elements of a perfect repentance in humanity for all the sin of man … excepting the personal consciousness of sin”.

The absence of guilt from Christ’s confession highlights the difficulty in describing it as “repentance.” When McLeod Campbell speaks of “an adequate sorrow and repentance”, he is bringing together two rather different things. It is one thing for Christ, in sorrow, to grieve over our sin. It is another thing for Him to repent of our sins. McLeod Campbell presents the two together - “an adequate repentance and sorrow for sin”. He maintains their atoning significance - “How far more truly than any penal infliction such repentance and confession must satisfy divine justice” (p. 145).

The distinction between Christ’s confession and His repentance may be observed in H R Mackintosh’s response to McLeod Campbell’s theology. Mackintosh appreciates his teaching that Christ “make(s) in our name a worthy acknowledgment both of our sin and of the holiness of God”. Concerning the idea of Christ repenting on our behalf, Mackintosh describes this as “inadmissible, not having ‘even a faint allusion’ in the New Testament” (cited in George M Tuttle, John McLeod Campbell on Christian Atonement: So Rich a Soil, p. 129).

However we may evaluate McLeod Campbell’s emphasis on Christ’s repentance, we must first ask, “How are we to understand his teaching?” Is it appropriate to describe his view as ‘vicarious repentance’? Tuttle suggests that “Campbell would not entertain the use of the designation ‘vicarious repentance’ if it appeared to bear the substitutionary ideas which had been affixed to the word vicarious.. Tuttle prefers the expression, “representative repentance”: “The idea of Christ’s representative repentance … is conceived to be exercised entirely with the prospective purpose that that they shall themselves be brought to repentance” (So Rich a Soil, p. 129).

Whatever debate there may be concerning the word ‘vicarious’. we must ask, “Can we offer a constructive interpretation of Campbell’s teaching concerning Christ’s repentance?” To understand him sympathetically, we require to emphasize his view of the atonement as “a development of the incarnation” (p. 142).

Laying great emphasis on this idea that “the atonement” is “a development of the incarnation”, C D Kettler insists that McLeod Campbell’s “teaching on vicarious repentance” should be understood in relation to “his emphasis upon the vicarious humanity of Christ” (The Vicarious Humanity of Christ and the Reality of Salvation, p. 190).

Kettler seeks to defend the idea of vicarious repentance. He cites some objections - “A common opinion is that Campbell’s doctrine of vicarious repentance only increases the old problem of vicarious punishment: How can one person repent / substitute himself for many?; “Repentance is not simply a sorrow for sin, … but “a change of heart and mind with respect to sin” … Can we transfer this to Jesus?” (pp. 195-196).

While acknowledging that “vicarious repentance is not taught explicitly in the New Testament”, Kettler argues that it is “a legitimate theological deduction based upon the importance of the doctrine of the vicarious humanity of Christ” (p. 197).

Highlighting McLeod Campbell’s emphasis on the importance of “viewing the results of salvation as a key to understanding salvation”, Kettler draws an analogy between repentance and other aspects of our experience of salvation: “the basis for our wisdom, our righteousness, and our sanctification is in Jesus Christ. So it is also true with repentance” (pp. 199, 197).

According to Kettler, “Vicarious repentance finds its origin in the same reality of Christ’s vicarious humanity as expressed in His worship, trust, communion, prayer and obedience to the Father … Vicarious repentance enables one to see the depth of the vicarious humanity of Christ as an indication that salvation is completely the work of God, sola gratia. yet it leaves a place for a genuine human response, based upon the response freely given in the obedient Sonship of Christ” (pp. 197, 203).

What are we to make of Kettler’s attempt to provide “a constructive understanding of ‘vicarious repentance’”?

We may appreciate his stress on the sola gratia character of salvation in each of its aspects, including repentance - “God … granted repentance unto life” (Acts 11:18). We may welcome his concern to emphasize that vicarious repentance does not preclude the need for “a genuine human response”.

There are, however, difficulties in applying the idea of repentance to Jesus Christ. Repentance is rather different from “worship, trust, communion, prayer and obedience to the Father”.

We should, however, note that Jesus was “baptized … to fulfil all righteousness”. This took place within the context of John’s ministry of “baptiz(ing) … unto repentance” those who came to him, “confessing their sins” (Matthew 3:11-16). How much weight can we place on this passage is unclear.

Kettler holds that “it is hard to understand the baptism of Jesus … apart from an idea of vicarious repentance”.

Whatever our reaction to the idea of vicarious repentance, the fact remains that Jesus’ baptism - “to fulfill all righteousness” - did take place within the context of a preaching ministry which called for both confession of sin and repentance from sin.

In developing the notion of vicarious repentance, McLeod Campbell draws upon insights from martin Luther (p. 146) and George Whitefield (p. 144). Drawing upon Luther, he writes, “Christ, the holy one of God, bearing the sins of all men on His spirit - in Luther’s words, ‘the one sinner - and meeting the cry of these sins for judgment, and the wrath due to them, absorbing and exhausting that divine wrath in that adequate confession and perfect response on the part of man which was possible only to the infinite and eternal righteousness in humanity”. This perfect response “is in contrast to man’s inability to respond adequately to God or, to quote Whitefield, ‘our repentance needeth to be repented of, and our very tears to be washed in the blood of Christ”.

Kettler offers a constructive exposition of McLeod Campbell’s use of Luther and Whitefield. He discusses Luther’s phrase - “the one sinner” - with reference to Karl Barth’s use of the idea of “the one great sinner”: “in Christ(’s) … becoming ‘the one great sinner’ … Barth sees the true meaning of the sinlessness of Christ. The sinlessness of Jesus is based on the obedience of Jesus, who did not refuse to take the place of sinners”.

Kettler cites Barth: “Our sin is no longer our own. It is His sin, the sin of Jesus Christ”. Kettler comments, “”The implication of this rather startling statement is similar to the doctrine of ‘vicarious repentance’ in John McLeod Campbell … In taking away the sin from humanity, Christ has become ‘the one great sinner’. Barth is able to say this because he has already qualified it in the light of his definition of the sinlessness of Christ. The sinlessness of Christ is the action of the obedient Son of God in taking the place of sinners and, therefore, becoming ‘the one great sinner’. In a remarkable way, Barth uses the very argument usually held against ‘vicarious repentance’, the sinlessness of Christ, as foundation for the doctrine” (ppp. 246-247).

Picking up on McLeod Campbell’s citation of Whitefield - “our repentance needeth to be repented of” - , Kettler writes, “Only in the context of such perfect holiness can the depth and horribleness of sin be truly known, and thus, can repentance truly take place”.

Concerning Christ’s vicarious repentance, Kettler comments, “the Son is able to provide the repentance which becomes the basis for the repentance of others … this is absolutely needed because of the inability of humanity to provide a perfect repentance” (pp. 198, 202).

As noted at the beginning of this post, McLeod Campbell’s teaching concerning Christ’s repentance is closely connected to his teaching concerning Christ’s confession. We return now to his teaching concerning Christ’ s confession, considering how this relates to what he has written about Christ’s repentance.

McLeod Campbell describes Christ’s confession thus: “Without the assumption of an imputation of guilt, and in perfect harmony with the unbroken consciousness of personal separation from our sins, the Son of God, bearing us and our sins on His heart before the Father, must needs respond to the Father’s judgment on our sins, with that confession of their evil and of the righteousness of the wrath of God against them, and holy sorrow because of them … ” (p. 139).

We may welcome McLeod Campbell’s emphases on both Christ’s “personal separation from our sins” and His “bearing us and our sins on His heart before the Father. Nevertheless, there are questions which need to be asked. As well as Christ’s “personal separation from our sins”, does not Scripture speak also of another separation - Christ’s separation from the Father, as our sin was laid upon Him? Does not the Biblical declaration - “He bore the sin of many” - involve more than what McLeod Campbell describes when he speaks of “the Son of God bearing us and our sins on His heart before the Father”?

We may, with J Orr, suspect that McLeod Campbell has “overstated his case in opposition to penal conceptions”. With Orr, we may appreciate his attempt to give to the atonement “a spiritual interpretation”. Also, with Orr, we may emphasize the importance of maintaining “its judicial aspect” while “remov(ing) from it the hard legal aspect it is apt to assume when treated as a purely external fact” (cited in Tuttle, So Rich a Soil, p. 114).

Whatever comment we may make regarding the limitations of McLeod Campbell’s theory of the atonement, we must seek to find a constructive interpretation of his emphasis on Christ’s confession.

It could be argued that Christ’s confession is less problematic than the idea of Christ’s repentance. When we read the words of 1 John 1:9 - “If we confess our sins, God is faithful and just and will forgive our sins and cleanse us from all unrighteousness” - , we become conscious of our own inability to confess our sins perfectly. It is a great comfort to know that “the blood of Jesus Christ cleanses us from every sin” (1 John 1:7). Can we think in terms of Christ’s confession when we consider how this blessing reaches us?

While the idea of Christ’s confession might appear to be less problematic than the idea of His repentance, it is not entirely problem-free. This becomes clear when we compare Christ’s confession with the confession of sin made on behalf of the people by godly leaders in the Old Testament. Christ was “without sin”, while even the most godly leaders were themselves sinners.

Rather than making comparisons between Christ and the godly leaders of the Old Testament, it may be more helpful to think of Christ’s whole life as a confession. The idea of Christ’s confession would, then, be a way of viewing His whole life, a way of understanding its significance, and not simply a description of a particular episode in His life.

Kettler comments helpfully on the way in which Christ’s confession can throw light on His vicarious repentance: “The vicarious repentance of Christ is, in a wider sense, the confession of Christ, the ‘confession’ which ‘confesses’ both the heart of God and the response of humanity, … not merely a confession of sin, but also of the ”most inestimable preciousness’ of humanity to the Father” (p. 191).

Christ’s intercession

Citing Isaiah 53:12 - “He bare the sins of many, and made intercession for the transgressors” - , McLeod Campbell emphases the place of Christ’s intercession in the atonement. He speaks of “the intercession by which that confession was followed up, must be taken into account as a part of the full response of the mind of the Son to the mind of the Father” (p. 147).

The idea of Christ’s intercession is clearly connected to the idea of Christ’s confession. This is most clearly seen in Christ’s prayer from the Cross. He prayed for those who crucified Him - “Father, forgive them for they know not what they do”. In this intercessory prayer, there seems to be an element of confession on our behalf - Christ lifting up our sins to the Father, understanding our sins better than we understand them ourselves - , coupledwith a prayer for our forgiveness.

Like His confession, Christ’s intercession can be interpreted in the broader context of His whole life.

McLeod Campbell describes Christ’s intercession as “the perfected expression of that forgiveness which He cherished towards those who were returning hatred for His love … the form His love must take if He would obtain redemption for us”.

There is a sense in which we consider Christ’s whole life as a prayer offered up to the Father on our behalf. In Christ’s response to the Father, we have both the “Amen to the divine condemnation of sin” and “the response … to the divine love in its yearnings over us sinners” (p. 148).

According to McLeod Campbell, this response can be described as Christ’s “atoning confession of sin and (His) intercession for sinners”. This response, which may be viewed as descriptive of the offering up of Christ’s whole life to the Father, is related by McLeod Campbell to our inability “to confess our own sins”. He writes, “if another could … act for us … an intercessor, - one at once sufficiently one with us, and yet sufficiently separated from our sin to feel in sinless humanity what our sinful humanity, could it in sinlessness look back on its sins, would feel of godly condemnation of them and sorrow for them, so confessing them before God, - one coming sufficiently near to our need of mercy to be able to plead for mercy for us according to that need, and at the same time, so abiding in the bosom of the Father, as in light of His love and secret of His heart, as in interceding for us to take full and perfect advantage of all that is there that is on our side, and wills our salvation” (p. 149).

This idea of Christ’s intercession carries us beyond His earthly life. We read, in Hebrews 7:25, of Christ, our great high priestly Intercessor: “He is able to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by Him, seeing that He ever liveth to make intercession for them”.

This aspect of Christ’s intercession may be viewed as the continuation of the intercession which was characteristic of His earthly life: “Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on Me through their word”(John 17:20).

While there may be other ways of understanding the atonement, we must not fail to recognize Christ’s intercession as one part of what it means for Him to be our Saviour. This emphasis on Christ’s intercession is a great comfort to us in our ongoing experience of salvation.

Concluding Comments

McLeod Campbell has said much from which we can learn, even if we feel unable to accompany him in his radical rejection of the idea of penal substitution.

We may not agree with some of the things he has written. We may feel that there is more to be said about the atonement than McLeod Campbell has said. Nevertheless, we may, through constructive interpretation of his writings, deepen our appreciation of the many-sidedness of the atonement without making his chief emphases the most central aspects of the atonement.

We may welcome his emphasis on the filial aspects of the atonement - “the divine purpose was that we should receive the adoption of sons” (p. 183) - without abandoning entirely a legal framework.

McLeod Campbell’s consistency in following a filial framework has produced significant insights. It could, however, be argued that his concern for consistency has blinkered him to other aspects of the atonement which did not appear to him to be within his own point of view.

The many-sidedness of the atonement teaches us that we must be neither too quick to abandon the idea of penal substitution nor too slow to learn from McLeod campbell.

Perhaps, the feature of McLeod Campbell’s theology we should highlight most is its “devotional quality”: “No one who reads The Nature of the Atonement can fail to recognize its quality of worshipful witness to the reconciling and liberating power of Christ as experienced by himself and perceived in others” (Tuttle, So Rich a Soil, pp. 141-142).

Whatever our evaluation of the precise details of McLeod Campbell’s theology, we can surely learn, from him, this lesson - theology is to be done in a spirit of worship.

Labels: ,

Michael Green on Evangelism

In the preface to his book, Evangelism and the Early Church , Michael Green states a personal reason for writing this book:
“Most evangelists are not very interested in theology: most theologians are not very interested in evangelism. I am deeply committed to both. So the study of this subject was particularly congenial to me” (p.7). Green’s book contains a brief but helpful section on “Teaching Evangelism” (pp.204-206).

Green’s emphasis on the unbreakable connection between theology and evangelism encourages us to develop an evangelistic theology.

A theology which does not lead to evangelism remains remote from both the Gospel of God and the need of human beings.

An evangelism which shows little interest in theological reflection tends to become rather superficial and stereotypes, lacking the depth and range of “teaching evangelism”.

Drawing on L Newbigin’s book, The Finality of Christ, Michael Green writes,

“It is one thing to claim that all salvation is through Christ … It is quite another to claim that nobody finds life with God unless they pass through the doorway of explicit Christian faith … The Christian Church has never maintained that overt knowledge of the person and work of Jesus was essential for salvation … So to maintain … that “there is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12) does not mean that no man can be saved unless he has heard of Jesus: it does mean that Jesus is the only Saviour of men” (The Truth of God Incarnate, edited by Michael green, pp. 118-119, emphasis mine).

Also of interest are the comments made by S H Travis in his book, I Believe in the Second Coming of Jesus (While this book was not written by Michael Green, there is a connection with him. He was the editor of the “I Believe …” series).

Commenting on those who have no real opportunity to hear the message of Christ, Travis writes, “it is possible to affirm the possibility of salvation for such people, without surrendering the belief that Jesus is God’s unique means of salvation. People who lived before Christ of after him in non-Christian cultures may find salvation through Christ, even though they do not know his name, by casting themselves on the mercy of God. If a Hindu finds salvation, it is not by virtue of being a good Hindu any more than a Christian is saved by being a good Christian. Whatever a person’s religious background, ‘saving faith’ involves coming to an end of one’s own ‘religion’ and abandoning oneself to the grace of God” (p. 204, emphasis original).

Labels: , , ,

Herman Dooyeweerd (1894-1977)

Dutch theologian. Born in Amsterdam, he graduated from the Free University there, and was assistant director of the Kuyper Institute, The Hague (1922–26), before appointment as professor of the philosophy of law in the Free University (1926–65). His major work, A New Critique of Theoretical Thought (4 vols., 1953–58), challenged the "pretended autonomy" by which philosophical thought asserts self-sufficient independence from divine revelation. He attacked speculative metaphysics, insisting that true knowledge of God and self-knowledge come from the working of God's Word and Spirit in the heart. Accepting the concepts of general revelation and common grace, he held that neither provides any foundation for natural theology based on man's unaided reason. Moreover, orthodox theology was no guarantee of true spiritual understanding; the latter comes through submission of the whole person to the message of Holy Scripture concerning "redemption b y Jesus Christ." Acceptance or rejection of this was "a matter of life and death to us, and not a question of theoretical reflection." In 1935 Dooyeweerd cofounded the journal Philosophia Reformata, and was prominent in the establishment of the Association for Calvinistic Philosophy (later called Christian Philosophy). From 1948 he was a member of the Royal Dutch Academy of the Sciences.

I wrote this article for The Twentieth Century Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge, editor J.D. Douglas, consulting editor, with Robert G. Clouse et al (Grand Rapids, Baker, 1991)

Labels:

Berkouwer and the Experiential Theology of Early Dutch Calvinism

The experiential theology of early Dutch Calvinism finds its clearest expression in the writings of a number of seventeenth century writers, such as William Ames, T J Frelinghuysen and William a Brakel.

William Ames, probably the most well-known representative of this type of theology, opens his book, The Marrow of Theology, with a definition of theology as “the teaching of living for God” (I, i, 1). (In his book, Historical Theology: An Introduction, G W Bromiley devotes several pages to discussing the views of Ames (pp. 307-316, 324-328, 332, 336-338). Acknowledging Ames’ intention of “relating theology more closely to life”, Bromiley suggests that there might be “a legalistic element” in the type of covenant theology propounded by Ames (pp. 310, 316).)

The experiential theology of early Dutch Calvinism was noted for its distinctive understanding of Christian doctrine. Doctrine was not meant merely for the mind to reflect upon. Doctrine was seen as arising out of the Christian experience in which the whole man had encountered God in Jesus Christ. Doctrine was seen as speaking to the whole man in the totality of his existence.

Experiential theology tended to emphasize such teachings as the new birth, conversion, sanctification with a view to the believer’s growth in an experiential knowledge of God’s saving grace.

The mood of this movement was that of zeal – zeal for spiritual growth. Its method was that of existential personalism, insisting that the whole man in the totality of his existence must be affected by religious experience which makes him aware of the centrality of his relation to God.

This method involved experiential theology in a reaction against scholasticism which was inclined to revel in logic and speculation.

Experiential theology was “an attempt to strike the same note found in Calvin and the Heidelberg Catechism, and grounded in Scripture, that man is called to live to the glory of God. There was nothing new in the teaching; much of it already appeared in medieval Dutch mysticism … It is a striking example of profound spirituality” (M E Osterhaven, “The Experiential Theology of Early Dutch Calvinism”, Reformed Review, Spring 1974, Vol. 27, No. 3, p.188).

Both the emphases and the roots of experiential theology are strikingly similar to those of Berkouwer.

* In Berkouwer’s writings, we see similar emphases to those of experiential theology – the emphasis on the whole man (Man: The Image of God (Man), pp. 312, 194), the centrality of man’s relation to God (Man, pp. 31-33, 195-196), the zeal for spiritual growth (the inclusion of a volume on Faith and Sanctification, in Berkouwer’s Studies in Dogmatics, emphasizes his concern for spiritual growth), the reiteration of personal motifs (the volumes on Faith and Justification, Faith and Sanctification and Faith and Perseverance, emphasize the importance of the personal motif in Berkouwer’s thought) and the critical attitude towards scholasticism (S Meijers observes that Berkouwer’s theology demonstrates “a consistent apologetic intention … directed at scholasticism” (Objectiviteit en Existentiialiteit (Objectivity and Existentiality), p. 448. In personal correspondence (Spring 1979), Meijers informed me that Berkouwer acknowledged the validity of this observation).

* The roots of experiential theology in “Calvin … the Heidelberg Catechism … Scripture … medieval Dutch mysticism …” (Osterhaven, p. 188) are similar to those of Berkouwer.

Berkouwer’s creative interpretation of Calvin and the Reformed Confessions must be understood in relation to his close affinities with the old Dutch Biblical piety.

* In his treatment of Calvin, he is concerned to move away from the more speculative development of later Calvinism to the warm Biblical piety of Calvin himself.

* In his treatment of the Reformed Confessions, he is concerned to interpret them according to their intentions, being careful to distinguish between the changeable form and the unchangeable content of the historically-conditioned confessions (Berkouwer, “Vragen rondom de belijdenis”, Gereformeeerde Theologische Tijdschrift, Februart 1963, Vol. 63, pp.1-41. This article is concerned with questions regarding the interpretation Of Confessions of faith. It pays special attention to the Canons of Dort).

The Reformed Confessions which Berkouwer seeks to interpret faithfully, have been formative in his religious thinking since early childhood when he was steeped in the confessional and catechetical instruction of the Dutch Reformed Church.

This element in Berkouwer’s background is surely closely related to the profound respect with which he treats the Reformed Confessions, even when he ventures to be critical of their historically-conditioned and, therefore, changeable form.

Of all the Reformed standards, the Heidelberg Catechism comes closest to Berkouwer’s own style of theologizing: “ … the Heidelberger was the great ‘existential’ catechism – if one can accept that word in a sixteenth-century context. It was anthropologically oriented, emphasizing not only the first person but even the more personal first person singular … Essentially, the Catechism was related to the spiritual life of man, not wrestling with theological abstractions … It propounded no subtle theological niceties but rather was a catechism characterized by such phrases as ‘How are you reminded and assured …’ and ‘What benefit do you receive …’ True Christian spirituality was not defined in terms of right doctrines, for ‘even the devils believe and tremble,’ but in terms of right actions” (J Tanis, “The Heidelberg Catechism in the Hands of the Calvinistic Pietists”, Reformed Review, Spring 1971, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 156-157).

This type of spirituality, found in the Heidelberg Catechism, formed an important source of inspiration for the experiential theology movement.

It is also highly characteristic of the spirituality of Berkouwer who is constantly searching for the “existential direction of Scripture” (H Berkhof, “De Methode van Berkouwer’s Theologie”, Ex Auditu Verbi: Theologische Opstellen Aangeboden aan Prof. Dr. G. C. Berkouwer, edited by R Schippers, G E Meuleman, J T Bakker and H M Kuitert, pp. 37-55. This book of theological essays was dedicated to Berkouwer on the occasion of his twenty-fifth anniversary of teaching at the Free University of Amsterdam. It contains essays written by notable theologians such as K Barth, O Cullmann, H Kung and T F Torrance. Berkhof uses the expression, “the existential direction of Scripture” to describe the theological tendency of the later Berkouwer (pp. 48-53)).

Berkouwer seeks continually to relate Christian truth to man in his primary relation to God (Man: The Image of God, p. 27; Divine Election, pp. 307, 326-329; The Return of Christ, p. 248).He reminds his readers repeatedly that the heart of Christian faith is to be found in a saving relationship to God (Holy Scripture, pp. 180. 322 where he emphasizes that the goal of Scripture is to bring knowledge of God).

Berkouwer may be regarded as a twentieth-century heir of the experiential theology movement of the seventeenth-century.

The best representatives of this movement – such as William Ames (The Marrow of Theology, I, xxvi, 26, 28; G W Bromiley, Historical Theology: An Introduction, pp. 336-338 – discussion of the teaching of Ames on sanctification – were careful in their emphasis on subjectivity not to lapse into subjectivism.

This has been a major concern of Berkouwer’s. He has places a strong emphasis on subjective experience without making that experience the norm for theology. He has emphasized that Christian theology gives expression to the truth which can only be known by faith yet is not itself produced by faith (Holy Scripture, pp. 9-10). The divine Reality can only be known through being in a relation of faith toward that Reality (Man: The Image of God, p. 35).

Labels: , ,

Berkouwer, Calvin, Arminius

Berkouwer and Calvin

Since Berkouwer fully intends to stand in in the line of the Reformation, it hardly needs to be said that the influence of John Calvin looms large in his background. Showing immense appreciation for Calvin, while never allowing himself to become completely uncritical of the great Reformer, he seeks, through creative interpretation rather than scathing criticism, to move beyond the fatalistic caricature of Calvin.
It is quite clear, from the number of references to Calvin in Berkouwer's writings, that Calvin has had a most significant influence on his thinking. Calvin is, in Berkouwer's view, of such great importance for Reformed theology that no theology, claiming to be Reformed, can proceed adequately without considerable exposition, interpretation and discussion of the writings of Calvin.
On the whole, Berkouwer shows considerable agreement with Calvin. Where there is disagreement, this tends to be minimized through sympathetic interpretation which accentuates their agreement. Whenever disagreement is inevitable, it is always respectful disagreement. Berkouwer's criticisms of Calvin are never offered without the greatest respect for the great Reformer.
While Berkouwer offers much sympathetic exposition and interpretation of Calvin, it is clearly not his intention 'to defend every one of Calvin's utterance concerning the doctrine of election' (Divine Election, p. 190). In
parti